Skip to content

The Humanity Compact

English

The thesis

A cost with no holder is never repaired.

Some costs cross borders and generations with no one having to answer for them: neither to measure them, nor to price them, nor to repair them. This work offers neither one more diagnosis nor one more remedy — it names, for each link, the institution that carries it.

The Humanity Compact is a book by Nizar Yaïche, former Minister of Finance of the Republic of Tunisia, published in open access. It proposes an architecture, the “7+3”: seven single-mandate institutions and three instruments that underpin them, for the costs that no one carries today.

The seven institutions of the chain, in the order a case file crosses them: measure, rate, price, adjust, finance, adjudicate, certify.HuIBmeasureGIRArateGFEApriceBFMadjustGSFfinanceCourtadjudicateIPDAcertify

7 functions · 7 proposed institutions · 3 cross-cutting instruments

Research proposal · version 2.3 · not peer-reviewed · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22746533 · 343 references · full text, open access · version history

Understand in five minutes Read the book Follow a case file end to end Explore the diagram Who is the author? Where does the publication stand?

The 7+3 architecture, in one diagram

Seven single-mandate institutions form the columns; the frieze carries the common taxonomy of externalities, the plinth the three instruments on which the whole rests.

How to read this image: each column is an institution that does one thing only. Follow the columns from left to right, in the order a case file crosses them. The frieze at the top classifies harms; the base carries the three instruments.

The Temple of Carthage — the 7+3 architecture Seven single-mandate institutions form the columns of a temple: measuring, rating, pricing, adjusting at the border, financing, adjudicating, certifying. The upper frieze carries the common taxonomy of externalities; the plinth carries the Carthage Charter, which founds and legitimises the whole. THE HUMANITY COMPACT CARTHAGE · 2026 HUMAN IMPACTS BOARD — COMMON TAXONOMY OF EXTERNALITIES Environment (6) · Financial (4) · Health (3) · Digital (2) · Climate (1) Geopolitics (1) · Economic (1) · Trade (1) · Human (1) Human Impacts Board Data, methods, uncertainties HuIB “the Board” Human Impacts Board answers to Peers, affected parties, methodology… SCIENTIFIC BODY Global Impact Rating Authority Coefficient, method, consistency GIRA “the Rating Authority” Global Impact Rating Authority answers to Appeals committee rated actors REGULATOR · RATING Global Financial Equity Authority Conversion function and incidence GFEA “the Equity Authority” Global Financial Equity Authority answers to Audit, contributing parties, Court REGULATOR · FISCAL Border Fairness Mechanism Base and non-discrimination BFM “the Mechanism” Border Fairness Mechanism answers to National authorities operators, courts TRADE INSTRUMENT Global Solidarity Fund Allocation decisions and results GSF “the Fund” Global Solidarity Fund answers to Contributors beneficiaries, audit FINANCIAL FUND Humanity Court Jurisdiction, reasoning, impartiality Humanity Court “the Court” Humanity Court answers to Appeal/review mechanisms, rules JUDICIAL BODY Inter-Parliamentary Digital Authority Standards, votes, algorithmic systems IPDA “the Digital Authority” Inter-Parliamentary Digital Authority answers to Member parliaments, the public REGULATOR · DIGITAL CARTHAGE CHARTER · GLOBAL ACCOUNTABILITY FRAMEWORK · CALL OF CARTHAGE GROUND AND LEGITIMISE THE ENTIRE ARCHITECTURE
The Temple of Carthage: the seven institutions of the accountability chain — measuring, rating, pricing, adjusting at the border, financing, adjudicating, certifying — governed by the Global Accountability Framework, the Carthage Charter and the Call of Carthage.

Explore this architecture in the interactive diagram

Each column of the diagram is a link. The same destinations, as text:

Three entry points, depending on the time you have. The profession named is only a marker: each suits any reader. Each entry quotes the book and gives its reading landmarks. Acronyms and definitions · Glossary of notions

Five minutes

For the diplomat: the argument in one page, as it is written in the book.

Understand the problem, the three completenesses, the status of the 7+3 and the proposed decision.

Reading guides, in English: Executive Summary; The argument in one page; the diagram of the chain; the final rule of this guide.

Full text · 19 objects of the argument · 7 functions, 7 institutions

One hour

For the economist: the full path, from the externality to the instrument.

See how deficit, completenesses, interfaces, functions and prevention fit together.

Reading guides, in English: §1.3–1.7; §2.5; §4; §5.9; §15.1–15.5.

Chain view · 20 externalities · 15 mechanisms · 8 classes, S0 to S6 (including S4 bis)

Half a day

For the mathematician: audit an annex — direct access to the technical annexes and to the evidence repository.

Audit mechanisms, counterfactuals, bounds, full cycle and protocols.

Reading guides, in English: §9; Annexes F, G, I, J, M and L.

17 annexes · 343 references · 24 stopping rules

By need

The book in sixteen sentences

One sentence per chapter, in the language of the book and without a word changed; each leads to the passage that carries it.

  1. Globalisation has displaced the effects of decisions far faster than it has displaced the mechanisms of responsibility. 1. Introduction
  2. The scale of the accountability deficit is not a matter of scarce means. 2. The accountability deficit
  3. Over the past three years, the United Nations has produced the most complete diagnosis of this problem ever drawn up — and has stopped, with remarkable consistency, at the threshold of binding implementation. 3. A dense international system that stops along the way
  4. A solution holds only if it places the human being and human values at the heart of the decision — and it keeps them there only by inscribing them in the very structure of that decision, rather than by entrusting them to the conscience of the decision-maker. 4. The theory of chain-based accountability: origins and design principles
  5. None of these institutions is invented from nothing: each generalises functions already at work somewhere — sectorally, regionally, or voluntarily — and links them together. 5. Seven functions, not necessarily seven new institutions
  6. Three principal instruments, distinct in their addressees and in their effects — not a single text with superimposed functions. 6. The legal, normative and civic system
  7. Certifying a model attests to its technical compliance, not to the legitimacy of the decision it informs: the latter remains human, reasoned and contestable. 7. Institutions equipped with AI, governed by humans
  8. It asks whether, once the seven functions and the three instruments have been specified, a single case file can pass through the whole architecture — without the measurement being redone, without the uncertainty disappearing, without the price preceding the law, without the funder commissioning its own evidence and without redress arriving too late. 8. The integrated demonstrator: an AI data centre
  9. Among the five transmission modes of Table 4, policy spillovers are the least theorised at the institutional level — and the one this research programme has dissected most completely. 9. Monetary spillovers: from incidence to bounded attribution
  10. The chain does not deal only with harm: applied to development financing, and in particular to the Sevilla Platform, it could make aid more effective by linking announced money to verifiable results. 10. From announced financing to actionable development
  11. Instrumented accountability is, upstream, an infrastructure of peace. 11. Preventive peace and resilience in the face of crises
  12. The question every reader should ask is not “is this desirable?” but “through what sequence of individually rational steps could any one of these elements come into being?”. 12. The political economy of adoption
  13. An architecture is credible not when it claims to have no internal tension, but when it can show where those tensions lie and how they are resolved. 13. Stress tests, objections and the cost of the architecture
  14. Sixteen limits bound the claims of this document, and each defines a research front on which collaboration is invited. 14. Limits, refutability and research programme
  15. An accountability chain that begins only after the harm has materialised remains incomplete where the mechanisms of propagation are reasonably foreseeable. 15. From corrective accountability to anticipatory accountability: the prevention loop
  16. Institutional responsibility begins when explanation by intention no longer suffices. Conclusion — From moral aspiration to structural responsibility

Seven functions, seven proposed institutions, and what each one may not do

Measuring precedes rating; rating precedes pricing. The order is not a presentation, it is the design: each holder’s negative mandate is the half that keeps the chain from closing back on itself.

Worked example, end to end: the 2021 allocation of special drawing rights (SDR) crosses the seven institutions, from measurement to certification.

Start with the text

The book can be read here, section by section, without downloading.

What the mapping contains

Every node and every link comes from the tables of the book or from its text. The links the book declares and those the scripts infer are counted separately, and the diagram draws them differently.

What the argument rests on

The 343 external references fall into four kinds. They are the only node type to which the palette of the diagram reserves a whole colour family: there, they can be seen without a legend.

Ask the book

The index covers the whole book. The search accepts a question in English or in French. The summary, when you ask for it, is produced by an artificial intelligence from the cited passages only: read the notice.