The thesis
A cost with no holder is never repaired.
Some costs cross borders and generations with no one having to answer for them: neither to measure them, nor to price them, nor to repair them. This work offers neither one more diagnosis nor one more remedy — it names, for each link, the institution that carries it.
The Humanity Compact is a book by Nizar Yaïche, former Minister of Finance of the Republic of Tunisia, published in open access. It proposes an architecture, the “7+3”: seven single-mandate institutions and three instruments that underpin them, for the costs that no one carries today.
7 functions · 7 proposed institutions · 3 cross-cutting instruments
Research proposal · version 2.3 · not peer-reviewed · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22746533 · 343 references · full text, open access · version history
Understand in five minutes Read the book Follow a case file end to end Explore the diagram Who is the author? Where does the publication stand?
The 7+3 architecture, in one diagram
Seven single-mandate institutions form the columns; the frieze carries the common taxonomy of externalities, the plinth the three instruments on which the whole rests.
How to read this image: each column is an institution that does one thing only. Follow the columns from left to right, in the order a case file crosses them. The frieze at the top classifies harms; the base carries the three instruments.
Explore this architecture in the interactive diagram
Each column of the diagram is a link. The same destinations, as text:
Three entry points, depending on the time you have. The profession named is only a marker: each suits any reader. Each entry quotes the book and gives its reading landmarks. Acronyms and definitions · Glossary of notions
Five minutes
For the diplomat: the argument in one page, as it is written in the book.
Understand the problem, the three completenesses, the status of the 7+3 and the proposed decision.
Reading guides, in English: Executive Summary; The argument in one page; the diagram of the chain; the final rule of this guide.
One hour
For the economist: the full path, from the externality to the instrument.
See how deficit, completenesses, interfaces, functions and prevention fit together.
Reading guides, in English: §1.3–1.7; §2.5; §4; §5.9; §15.1–15.5.
Half a day
For the mathematician: audit an annex — direct access to the technical annexes and to the evidence repository.
Audit mechanisms, counterfactuals, bounds, full cycle and protocols.
Reading guides, in English: §9; Annexes F, G, I, J, M and L.
By need
The book in sixteen sentences
One sentence per chapter, in the language of the book and without a word changed; each leads to the passage that carries it.
Globalisation has displaced the effects of decisions far faster than it has displaced the mechanisms of responsibility.
1. IntroductionThe scale of the accountability deficit is not a matter of scarce means.
2. The accountability deficitOver the past three years, the United Nations has produced the most complete diagnosis of this problem ever drawn up — and has stopped, with remarkable consistency, at the threshold of binding implementation.
3. A dense international system that stops along the wayA solution holds only if it places the human being and human values at the heart of the decision — and it keeps them there only by inscribing them in the very structure of that decision, rather than by entrusting them to the conscience of the decision-maker.
4. The theory of chain-based accountability: origins and design principlesNone of these institutions is invented from nothing: each generalises functions already at work somewhere — sectorally, regionally, or voluntarily — and links them together.
5. Seven functions, not necessarily seven new institutionsThree principal instruments, distinct in their addressees and in their effects — not a single text with superimposed functions.
6. The legal, normative and civic systemCertifying a model attests to its technical compliance, not to the legitimacy of the decision it informs: the latter remains human, reasoned and contestable.
7. Institutions equipped with AI, governed by humansIt asks whether, once the seven functions and the three instruments have been specified, a single case file can pass through the whole architecture — without the measurement being redone, without the uncertainty disappearing, without the price preceding the law, without the funder commissioning its own evidence and without redress arriving too late.
8. The integrated demonstrator: an AI data centreAmong the five transmission modes of Table 4, policy spillovers are the least theorised at the institutional level — and the one this research programme has dissected most completely.
9. Monetary spillovers: from incidence to bounded attributionThe chain does not deal only with harm: applied to development financing, and in particular to the Sevilla Platform, it could make aid more effective by linking announced money to verifiable results.
10. From announced financing to actionable developmentInstrumented accountability is, upstream, an infrastructure of peace.
11. Preventive peace and resilience in the face of crisesThe question every reader should ask is not “is this desirable?” but “through what sequence of individually rational steps could any one of these elements come into being?”.
12. The political economy of adoptionAn architecture is credible not when it claims to have no internal tension, but when it can show where those tensions lie and how they are resolved.
13. Stress tests, objections and the cost of the architectureSixteen limits bound the claims of this document, and each defines a research front on which collaboration is invited.
14. Limits, refutability and research programmeAn accountability chain that begins only after the harm has materialised remains incomplete where the mechanisms of propagation are reasonably foreseeable.
15. From corrective accountability to anticipatory accountability: the prevention loopInstitutional responsibility begins when explanation by intention no longer suffices.
Conclusion — From moral aspiration to structural responsibility
Seven functions, seven proposed institutions, and what each one may not do
Measuring precedes rating; rating precedes pricing. The order is not a presentation, it is the design: each holder’s negative mandate is the half that keeps the chain from closing back on itself.
Worked example, end to end: the 2021 allocation of special drawing rights (SDR) crosses the seven institutions, from measurement to certification.
- Human Impacts BoardHuIBmeasuredoes not rate, does not price
- Global Impact Rating AuthorityGIRAratesets no price
- Global Financial Equity AuthorityGFEApricedoes not collect
- Border Fairness MechanismBFMadjustnever targets the country, only the process
- Global Solidarity FundGSFfinancenever imposes austerity
- Humanity CourtCourtadjudicatedoes not judge expediency, enforces nothing
- Inter-Parliamentary Digital AuthorityIPDAcertifynever touches the content
Start with the text
The book can be read here, section by section, without downloading.
What the mapping contains
Every node and every link comes from the tables of the book or from its text. The links the book declares and those the scripts infer are counted separately, and the diagram draws them differently.
- 915nodes
- 1 655links
- 122links declared by the book
- 1 533links inferred by the scripts
- 412sections mapped
- 343external references
What the argument rests on
The 343 external references fall into four kinds. They are the only node type to which the palette of the diagram reserves a whole colour family: there, they can be seen without a legend.