Annex C — Complementary references

Annex 3 of 17 · ≈ 5 min read · 42 paragraphs · section 25 of 40 · search the book

Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D. (2000) ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’, International Organization, 54(3), pp. 421–456. doi:10.1162/002081800551280.¶ 1

Barnett, M.N. and Finnemore, M. (1999) ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53(4), pp. 699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048.¶ 2

Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H. and Zelli, F. (2009) ‘The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis’, Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), pp. 14–40. doi:10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.¶ 3

Black, J. (2008) ‘Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes’, Regulation & Governance, 2(2), pp. 137–164. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x.¶ 4

Buchanan, A. and Keohane, R.O. (2006) ‘The legitimacy of global governance institutions’, Ethics & International Affairs, 20(4), pp. 405–437. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.¶ 5

Gehring, T. and Faude, B. (2014) ‘A Theory of Emerging Order within Institutional Complexes: How Competition among Regulatory International Institutions Leads to Institutional Adaptation and Division of Labor’, The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), pp. 471–498. doi:10.1007/s11558-014-9197-1.¶ 6

Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R.B. (2005) ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3–4), pp. 15–62.¶ 7

Koppell, J.G.S. (2005) ‘Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”’, Public Administration Review, 65(1), pp. 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x.¶ 8

Schmidt, V.A. (2013) ‘Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and throughput’, Political Studies, 61(1), pp. 2–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x.¶ 9

National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.¶ 10

ISO/IEC (2023) ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Information technology — Artificial intelligence — Management system.¶ 11

United Nations (1958) Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. New York.¶ 12

United Nations (1969) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Vienna.¶ 13

International Law Commission (2011) Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations.¶ 14

World Trade Organization (1994) General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994; General Agreement on Trade in Services; Agreements on Technical Barriers to Trade and on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.¶ 15

United Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco, 26 June 1945 (entered into force: 24 October 1945), in particular arts 22, 25, 94, 96 and 103.¶ 16

United Nations (1945) Statute of the International Court of Justice, annexed to the Charter, in particular arts 59 and 65.¶ 17

United Nations (2015) Paris Agreement. Paris, 12 December 2015 (entered into force: 4 November 2016), in particular arts 4(2), 13, 14 and 15.¶ 18

United Nations (1987) Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Montreal, 16 September 1987 (entered into force: 1 January 1989), in particular arts 2(9), 4, 5, 8 and 10.¶ 19

United Nations (1989) Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. Basel, 22 March 1989 (entered into force: 5 May 1992), in particular arts 4(5) and 4A (Ban Amendment, in force on 5 December 2019).¶ 20

United Nations (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Montego Bay, 10 December 1982 (entered into force: 16 November 1994), in particular Part XII, Part XV, arts 235, 287 and 298.¶ 21

World Health Organization (2005) International Health Regulations (2005), 3rd edn and amendments of 2022 and 2024. Geneva: WHO (adopted 23 May 2005 under art. 21 of the WHO Constitution; entered into force: 15 June 2007; 196 States parties).¶ 22

World Health Organization (1946) Constitution of the World Health Organization. New York, 22 July 1946, in particular arts 21 and 22.¶ 23

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention). Aarhus, 25 June 1998 (entered into force: 30 October 2001), in particular arts 9 and 15, and decision I/7 (2002).¶ 24

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1991) Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention). Espoo, 25 February 1991 (entered into force: 10 September 1997).¶ 25

International Law Commission (2001) Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II(2), in particular arts 2, 28–39 and 42–48.¶ 26

Permanent Court of International Justice (1928) Factory at Chorzów (Germany v. Poland), Merits, Judgment No. 13, 13 September 1928, PCIJ Series A No. 17.¶ 27

Complementary references — development and peace (chapters 10 and 11)

Galtung, J. (1969) ‘Violence, Peace, and Peace Research’, Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), pp. 167–191.¶ 28

Lederach, J.P. (1997) Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.¶ 29

United Nations and World Bank (2018) Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank and New York: United Nations.¶ 30

United Nations Secretary-General (2023) A New Agenda for Peace. Our Common Agenda Policy Brief 9. New York: United Nations.¶ 31

United Nations General Assembly (2024) Resolution 79/1, The Pact for the Future, 22 September 2024. New York: United Nations.¶ 32

United Nations Secretary-General (2024) Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace. Report A/79/552–S/2024/767. New York: United Nations.¶ 33

United Nations (2025a) Compromiso de Sevilla and Sevilla Platform for Action, Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, Sevilla, 30 June–3 July 2025.¶ 34

United Nations Financing for Sustainable Development Office (2026a) Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2026. New York: United Nations.¶ 35

United Nations Financing for Sustainable Development Office (2026b) Sevilla Platform for Action — Delivering Early Results, 2026 ECOSOC Financing for Development Forum. New York: United Nations.¶ 36

United Nations Financing for Sustainable Development Office (2026c) Sevilla Platform for Action, live registry. Consultation and all counts as of 25 July 2026.¶ 37

United Nations Development Programme (2024) Humanitarian–Development–Peace Nexus Approaches in Conflict and Disaster Settings. New York: UNDP Independent Evaluation Office.¶ 38

World Bank (2017) World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank.¶ 39

‘To prevent does not mean to predict with certainty; it means making indifference impossible in the face of a risk that has become reasonably visible.’¶ 40

PART IV — FROM THE MODEL TO THE PILOT¶ 41

This final part leads from the model to the decision: by what political economy the architecture could be adopted, what it yields under the stress tests and the objections, at what cost, and on what pilot it should be maintained, simplified or rejected.¶ 42

@incollection{yaiche_hc_annexe_c,
  author    = {Yaïche, Nizar},
  title     = {Annex C — Complementary references},
  booktitle = {The Humanity Compact},
  year      = {2026},
  version   = {2.3},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.22746533},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  url       = {https://humanitycompact.org/ouvrage/annexe-c/}
}

A book by Nizar Yaïche, former Minister of Finance of the Republic of Tunisia. Who is the author?